As the statement of the speaker indicates, the study of history involves too much emphasis on individuals who have played crucial roles in proper(postnominal) historical events and trends. Admittedly, the emphasis on those individuals helps us better memorize those specific historical movements and educates us on important prominent figures in politics and history. Therefore, emphasizing their influence is reasonable. However, I fundamentally curb with the speaker that groups of people whose identities have long been forgotten have made those historical events possible and their roles should be placed as important.
The Great Men theory is usually attributed to the Scottish philosopher doubting Thomas Carlyle, who asserted that the history is not but the biography of gigantic men. He believed that it is the few, the powerful and the famous individuals who attribute a lot to significant events and trends in history that shape our corporal destiny as a species. In truth, his claim to most extent does explain the great influence those distinguished individuals exert.
bring the influence on the process of study history. By learning well-nigh the life stories or different introductory articles about those individuals, we can more easily understand a accredited historical event or movement. By acknowledging the character of those individuals, we score spiritual incentives from their success or brilliant leadership.
On the other hand, too much emphasis on individuals does more terms than good to the public, since the glory and achievement of the famous few can be recognized while the essence of the specific events and trends in history as well as the roles of groups who also chip in a lot in the events are overlooked. One casing is...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment