Youth Crime

In motivational theory, the some peerless has legitimate desires but can non satisfy them. This inability forces the person into unnatural behavior. Control or bonding theories postulate that, since the person's conventional ties withstand been broken, the person feels free to commit delinquent acts. Another tralatitious theory is cultural deviance, in which the delinquent conforms to a decline of standards not accepted by a large or more powerful society (Hirschi, 1969, chs. 1-4). Whatever the theory to which one subscribes, juvenile crime is on the increase, and the current juvenile legal expert clay is unable to stop the rising tide.

The c every(prenominal) to eliminate the juvenile justice system comes from small towns as salutary as large urban aras. Media reports of the escalating rates of crime and ferocity have inflamed public opinion. Meanwhile, politicians and fairness obligatement officials are doing whatsoever they can to protect the citizenry. Unfortunately, law enforcement cannot protect everyone. Despite all the theories, none of the approaches used in the juvenile justice system has met with any significant success. Discerning which y come to the forehs will become duplicate offenders and return to the sustenance of crime and which will not is not possible. If the juvenile justice system were a business, it would be out of business. Public systems are designed to serve the public ethical and welfare. In its current form, the juvenile justice system is flunk to protect the public. It is failing the childre

glassworker (1994) points out that, in close states, early dayss who are moveenced as adults are sent to adult prisons. Reform experts maintain that, at most prisons, this means either sending them to crime college or handing them over to adult sexual predators. A study in Florida indicated that juveniles sent to adult prisons were more likely than adults to return to a life of crime after their release from prison (p. 177).

Legislators and some law enforcement officials want stricter sentencing guidelines for violent juveniles. Experts are divided on the surmount prevention strategy. Some claim the easy availability of guns and drugs should be targeted if decreasing crime is the objective.

Other experts say increased sustainment for juveniles is essential. They need better education, familial support, and rehabilitation. Tougher sentences could turn some juveniles into charge criminals. The legal and social implications of juvenile crime are composite plant and affect every aspect of the communities in which plenty live.

Forbes, S. (1993, June). rough crime: Changes that could reverse the rise in juvenile crime. Forbes, 26.

A number of state legislatures are considering proposals to give young people adult sentences for violent crimes, outlaw gun possession and enforce more stringent remedies. Law enforcement officials are faced with the continuing escalation of violent youth crime. Ten years ago, most youth offenses were petty in nature. The children's code was not written to extension the types of crimes committed by today's youth (Glazer, 1994, pp. 173-175).

In a upstart article, Carmine Sarracino (1996) quoted FBI reports that "murders committed by adults rose 5.2 percentage during the 1980s. In the same period, murders committed by juveniles increased 60 percent" (p. 28). Steve Forbes (1993) gives similar statistics. Between 1987 and 1991, according to the FBI, the number of youth low 18 arrested for violent crimes increased by 50 percent. untamed
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.