Beginning in 1966 lead by Minnesota, Wisconsin, California and Kansas, 25 states passed community corrections laws and make funds available for improved probation programs, including a plethora of utility(a) facilities for handling prisoners on probation outside of full time incarceration (Jones, 1990, May, p. 114; Leone, 1997, p. 132).
After an initial flush of enthusiasm, public support for much(prenominal) alternatives waned. As crime rates rose sharply in the 1980s, greater stress was placed on more industrious law enforcement, the adoption of mandatory minimum sentencing laws for violent crimes, waken crimes and drug-related crimes (in 49 states and the federal government), longer sentences under three strikes laws for right repeat felony offenders (in more than 25 states, the federal government and D.C.) and accuracy in sentencing (requiring prisoners to serve out most of their sentences). By 1990, entirely 17,079 out of 698,870 inmates in state prisons and jails participated in alternatives to durance and neat probation (Leone, 1997, p. 132).
By the late 1980s, public interest in alternatives to full-time imprisonment attracted renewed interest largely because of the overcrowded condition of t
Worth, R. (1998, December). Making criminals pay. Washington Monthly, 30, 20-30.
Winkler, M. (1993, July-August). Walking prisons: The create technology of electronic controls. Futurist, 27, 34-37.
Overall, Morris & Tonry (1990) said that "to our knowledge there ar no methodologically satisfactory studies of the comparative advantages and disadvantages of intermittent imprisonment; in theory, it makes sense . . ." (p. 219).
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment