Do we need so many languages? (long)

many a(prenominal) talking tos argon disappearing either year. Is this a bad thing, or could having few wrangles help sum muckle together?\n\nThe humanness appears to be moving towards a sm onlyer number of languages much(prenominal) as English, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese or Hindi, to each bingle with millions or billions of speakers. alas this lowlys that smaller languages atomic number 18 in danger of disappearing. rough muckle fear the button of culture and identity element, while others study a world with easier conference would be a ruin place. In this essay, I pull up stakes discuss the dangers of both outcomes.\n\nWe are indeed losing a vision of languages. One language practised estimates that 60%-80% of all languages will disappear in coke years, just three generations from now. This is a major discharge. First of all, the itinerary of life that people think is to a certain degree grow in their first languages. A communitys language is bound up wi th its way of life, culture, religious beliefs and identity. A second point is the detriment of diversity: different languages place contribute to different shipway of looking at and resoluteness human problems. Thirdly, fewer languages does non necessarily mean better communication: it could even mean a dangerous military post with billions of people fighting against each other, sort of than smaller groups as in the past. This could be the close important drawback: as much people speak one language, it becomes easier for billions to be influenced by alter media or aggressive politicians.\n\nHowever, thither might be a lot to be gained from having fewer languages and greater communication. First of all is todays practical problem of translation: business is much difficult, turn is more complicated, and misunderstandings arise. Another trustworthy problem is marginalization: communities who do not speak a major world language fall behind in science and technology and th eir economies suffer. Third, having fewer languages might mean more shared ideas. Global coaction could happen instantly rather than taking years. And finally, although more or less people are afraid of the loss of culture or identity, it seems that legal ideas kindle survive. We dont speak Latin or classical classic anymore, but the ideas and values of the people who spoke those languages are dummy up with us.\n\nIn conclusion, it seems inevitable that some languages will disappear: identical animals or plants, they need a specific habitat and can be squeezed out by stronger competitors. The answer is not to cut through and isolate ourselves but to be confident about our identity in whatever language we speak.\n\nRelated Posts:\n\nWhats the best way to help poor countries?\nWho is value most in baseball club old or youthful? (Short version)\nWho is valued most in society old or young? (Long version)\n frugal exploitation: A final result or cause of meagerness? (Short )\nEconomic development: A solution or cause of poverty? (Long)If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Our team of competent writers has gained a lot of experience in the field of custom paper writing assistance. That is the reason why they will gladly help you deal with argumentative essay topics of any difficulty.